![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 2 rating(s)
![]()
Current Members: 31
Bookmark URL: http://my.billingsgazette.com/Groups/Animal_Crackers |
|
|
Truth in Advertising: If Only the Truth Were Provided
Posted by: jn at 12:44PM MT on April 6, 2009
In February 2009, Dyne Immune LLC issued a press release boasting their new "Rabies RAPID Screen", claiming the test can detect the presence of rabies in animal saliva within 35 minutes.
Problem is, and it's two-fold, the product is neither approved by the USDA nor the FDA or FDA/CVM. Nor is the test reliable in any way, shape or form. In March 2009, the New York City Health Department in coordination with a zoological veterinarian, issued a warning letter to vets (pdf file) suggesting to avoid the test, noting the test is ineffective for diagnosing rabies and can lead to countless needless, unnecessary deaths of animals if the product is used, it is completely unreliable. The NYC Health Department focuses on such a case where a healthy kitten had been unnecessarily euthanized due to gross negligence upon a false positive result using Dyne Immune's test. A subsequent proper rabies laboratory test confirmed the kitten was NOT positive for rabies. Unfortunately, Dyne Immune LLC got their hands into a lucrative advertising market and subsequently, has passed the dubious information into the media, which has led to hundreds of pet owner and pet health websites posting misinformed merits of the product when in fact, it appears the actual product is only in a testing phase. Another problem is misinformed animal shelter staff assuming the validity of the product and potentially causing untold euthanasias of healthy, adoptable pets. Let's see what Dyne Immune posts on their website. Not very informative at best, dangerous at worst: Well, first, I think it's more productive for vets to buy a SNAP test that obtains results in as little as 10 minutes (most are), as opposed to 35 minutes. This begs the question of validity simply due to a resting sample at 35 minutes and whether temperature may affect the sample. (most reliable SNAP tests in small animal veterinary use today can obtain results in 10 minutes, the preparation is fast, a resting sample is not usually at risk for temperature variations). Next, if a negative result doesn't reflect any accuracy, why use it?
A positive would MOST CERTAINLY require additional testing, hopefully in the form of a more specific assay test (from an outside lab with knowledge and experience). But say we've already spent a lot of money on your fabulous tests, this is only increasing the cost to the veterinarian, the client, and the pet (in terms of monitoring, or quarantine). Hopefully, vets and animal shelters have the common sense to avoid your test at all costs. Perhaps even more alarming and incredulous is the fact that Dyne Immune provides no obvious information to studies, clinical research or clinical trials for the product. There is of course a link to request more information, I assume should you inquire, you'll be sent to a page with limited and dubious studies, none verified by a peer review of course. And they state the test can be used for domestic, wild and agriculture animals. So assume for a moment, you're out there in the field, you don't have a lot of opportunity to re-test that same animal, nor do you have a pristine condition in which to test. Absurd. Buyer beware, if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. If you come across this in articles on your favorite pet sites, please set the record straight to the webmasters of the sites. |
About This Blog
Because life ain't worth living without the dog who sniffs the guests and the cat who shreds the toiletpaper. All things fun and educational in the crazy world of pets.
Older Posts
Current Entries
August 7, 2009 July 31, 2009 July 29, 2009 July 26, 2009 July 20, 2009 July 18, 2009 July 15, 2009 July 13, 2009 July 9, 2009 July 2, 2009 July 1, 2009 June 27, 2009 June 26, 2009 June 21, 2009 June 19, 2009 June 17, 2009 June 15, 2009 June 13, 2009 June 12, 2009 June 11, 2009 May 28, 2009 May 25, 2009 May 24, 2009 May 21, 2009 May 20, 2009 May 19, 2009 May 7, 2009 May 6, 2009 May 4, 2009 April 24, 2009 April 23, 2009 April 21, 2009 April 18, 2009 April 16, 2009 April 11, 2009 April 9, 2009 April 6, 2009 April 5, 2009 April 4, 2009 April 3, 2009 April 1, 2009 March 31, 2009 March 30, 2009 |