2 rating(s)
Animal Crackers
 | See More Groups...
Loading...
Current Members: 31
Bookmark URL: http://my.billingsgazette.com/Groups/Animal_Crackers
"G-Force" And Teaching Your Kids Tough Love
Posted by: jn at 3:34PM MT on July 26, 2009


It happens every time a pet-themed movie comes out in theaters.  101 Dalmatians (and it's sequel), Beverly Hills Chihuahua, the yellow lab retriever in Marley and Me.  And so on and so on...here we go again with Disney's G-Force.

Every single time, parents relent and buy or adopt one of the adorable icons for their children.  And every single time, shelters across the country are soon inundated with those relinquished icons.

Kids and adults alike might enjoy the animated little critters and 3-D effects in the movies.  But, young kids aren't able to distinguish fantasy critters from live critters, nor do they understand the involvement of every day care, feeding, cleaning of cages, and playtime and bonding as well as veterinary care and expenses necessary to maintain the pet.  A new pet is often a novelty item for a young child, and after a month or so, the novelty wears off, the pet becomes a "chore", becomes neglected by both the child and the parent who acted with disregard to the pet AND the child, and the pet inevitably ends up at a shelter.  Sadly, many of them euthanized.

One rescue group was so concerned, they were on hand at a theater's G-Force movie opening with guinea pigs on display to teach awareness about guinea pig ownership and adoption. (how cool is that!)

Parents, be responsible, teach your kids that movies are not real life situations.  Teach your kids that pets are a responsibility, for the lifetime of the pet.  When you teach responsibility, you also teach admiration for, and compassion for the species.  Your kids will admire and respect you more in the long run for not accommodating their every wish.

If you feel your children are responsible caretakers for pets, then ensure both you and your child are aware of their special needs, including specific foods, accommodating environment, the need for regular veterinary care, activity and social needs.  For guinea pigs, rodents, pocket pets, fish and some birds and reptiles, their life spans are relatively short, are you prepared to handle the grief aspect once the pet's life ends?  Are you prepared to take over the care of the pet if your child eventually defaults on his/her promises?  Think about that, research the species, teach your children well and you will then be armed to make informed and rational decisions.

Let's review:



Computer-generated animated guinea pig: no care required, except by mechanical intervention by movie crew and computer graphic artists.  Approximate lifespan:  Infinate, immortal, especially where royalties are concerned.



Real, live guinea pig: requires proper care by a real live human to feed, water, provide appropriate environment/habitat, play with, bond with, exercise, love, and receive regular veterinary care.  Approximate lifespan:  5-7 years.


Chemnutra Owners Plead Guilty To Role In 2007 Pet Food Recall
Posted by: jn at 11:34AM MT on June 19, 2009


Kansas City -- The owners of a pet-food company implicated in the 2007 recall that is estimated to have killed about 4,000 pets pleaded guilty to some of the charges leveled against them.

Sally Qing Miller and her husband, Stephen S. Miller, of Las Vegas, were indicted, along with their company, Chemnutra Inc., in 2008 for their alleged role in the 2007 pet food recall.

Chemnutra buys food and food components from China, then imports and distributes those foods in the United States, according Matt J. Whitworth, acting U.S. attorney for the western district of Missouri.

The Millers imported more than 13 shipments, totaling 800 metric tons, of wheat gluten tainted with melamine between November 2006 and February 2007, Whitmore says. The tainted wheat gluten was then used to make various brands of pet food -- 150 brands of which were later recalled, but not before an estimated 1,950 cats and 2,200 dogs died from eating the tainted food.

The Millers and their company each pleaded guilty to one count of selling adulterated food and one count of selling misbranded food. They Millers are subject to up to two years in federal prison without parole, plus a fine of up to $200,000 and restitution, according to Whitmore.

Chemnutra as a company is subject to a $400,000 fine and restitution.

China was also implicated in melamine-tainted baby formula that killed six infants and made thousands of babies sick with kidney stones. The former company chairwoman was jailed for life and fined $3.6 million for her role in the scandal.

In 2007, Menu Foods recalled 60 million containers of cat and dog food after animals died of kidney failure. The FDA alone had received more than 8,000 complaints.

Sentencing hearings have not yet been scheduled.

U.S. attorney's news release 

The Associated Press has more about the case 

 


Oh, The Irony: Rachael Ray's Dangerous Pet Food Recipes
Posted by: jn at 2:58PM MT on June 13, 2009

To promote her “Nutrish” line of packaged dog food, Food Network's Rachael Ray published a recipe intended for human consumption in a popular dog lover’s magazine (Modern Dog Magazine, Winter 2008/2009 Edition). The recipe, “Isaboo’s Butternut Squash Mac and Chedder” was inspired, states Ray, by her pit bull Isaboo’s love of squash. But readers were confused and believed the recipe, which included an ingredient that could potentially kill dogs, was intended for dogs.

Nowhere in the magazine article did it state that the recipe was intended for humans, not dogs. And the text accompanying the recipe contained a disclaimer suggesting owners check with their dogs’ veterinarians, again leading many to believe the recipe was for dogs.

Any veterinarian can tell you that onions can cause potentially fatal hemolytic anemia.  The amount ingested makes little difference in terms of size of dog, or ability to metabolize or filter toxins.

Modern Dog Magazine has since added a mild disclaimer (but not before promoting and praising Ray first)  to the website, stating:

"[Rachael Ray's recipe includes onions, which are NOT good for dogs, but the amount included in the recipe is small when considered over the whole of the recipe. Always check with your vet which foods are appropriate to share with your dog. --Ed.] "

The feedback shows readers were still upset, however, and say the magazine should have known better than to publish a recipe containing onions intended for dogs. Some commenters also included links to the ASPCA's Animal Poison Control Center website page concerning onion toxity yet the magazine has taken no further action on the matter.

The recipe is still on Ray’s “Everyday” Magazine website  --under a “Pet Friendly” header, accompanied by a photo of her dog appearing to be eating the concoction-- which, yep, still contains onion.

So what's wrong with the recipes?

Not only is it onions that pet owners need to be concerned about, but a large number of the 36  "pet friendly" recipes Ray has posted, contain ingredients that are potentially toxic, other ingredients are completely inappropriate for pets. 

Let's look at the list of ingredients Ray includes in various recipes intended for pets.  I've also included the dangers that Ray failed to disclose:

Garlic (toxic to pets, particularly cats, causes Heinz body anemia, potentially fatal)
Onion (toxic to pets - causes Heinz body/Hemolytic anemia, potentially fatal - large amounts are used in the recipes)
Salt (detrimental to kidneys and heart in pets, plus high potential for fluid losses and electrolyte imbalances)
Various cheeses (including cheddar, swiss, monterey jack, parmesan, etc - high in fat, causes constipation and/or diarrhea)
Pepper (non-palatable to pets, unnecessary)
Bacon (very high in fat content - in a large majority of the recipes)
Various breads (including wheat - wheat intolerances are common in pets - high in carbohydrates and sugar - large amounts of breads in the recipes, including "buttered" bread)
Avocado (high in fat, some evidence of toxicity in pets)
Spinach (some evidence of spinach leaves toxicity in pets)
Lettuce (no nutritional value - unnecessary)
Lime juice (non-palatable to pets, unncessary)
Orange juice (non-palatable to pets, uncessary)
Hot pepper sauce (she has got to be kidding!)
Chicken and Turkey (high fat content, potential for GI upset and diarrhea)
Soy sauce (high level of salt)
Peanuts (high in protein and fat, no nutritional purpose to give to pets)
Flour and wheat flour (as noted above, wheat intolerances common in pets)
Corn meal (many dogs have allergic reaction to corn products)
Olive oil (fat content - used in nearly every single one of her recipes)
Milk (high in fat, cats in particular are lactose intolerant, causes diarrhea, excess gas in the stomach and intestine, distended abdomen)
Baking spices (used in many of the recipes, no established safety margin in pets, no nutritional purpose for pets)
Deli ham (high levels of fat and salt)
Corned beef (high in fat and salt)
Half and half (high fat content)
Heavy cream (high fat content)
Eggs (used in a large number of the recipes, in large amounts, whole, high protein content)
Peppercorns (use your head, Rachael!)
Barley (some dogs have intolerances)
Macaroni (high in carbohydrates)
Cream Cheese (high in fat)

There are large amounts of ingredients in most of the recipes (as if she were feeding a human family of four), yet small yields, i.e., 4 servings, all loaded with high fat and ingredients inappropriate for pets. As a matter of fact, most of the recipes could cause pancreatitis in dogs, a painful, debilitating, serious condition that requires extensive (and expensive) veterinary treatment.  If a dog survives an episode of acute pancreatitis, it can subsequently lead to chronic pancreatitis (potentially affecting the dog's health for life).

Rachael Ray ignores veterinarians and pet health care advocates who have tirelessly campaigned against pet obesity and continue to diligently educate pet owners on proper diet and nutrition, promote pet exercise, promote early prevention to avoid serious health complications associated with obesity such as: heart disease, diabetes, liver disease, arthritis, and pancreatitis, to name a few.  Rachael Ray seems to be the poster child for irresponsible pet ownership.

Ray and her parent company, Reader's Digest, have also ignored numerous complaints and requests citing the dangers, to have the recipes taken down from the website, to no avail.

Last I checked, in April of this year, Ray had various, inconsistent disclaimers scattered among few recipes and elsewhere on the website:

"Always check with your vet about which foods are appropriate for you to share with your pet."

"Check with your pet's doctor before feeding it any human food.  Pets can't digest the same things we can and your vet is the best person to help you decide if this recipe is right for your pooch."

"Note!  You should not feed your pet human food without first clearing it with your pet's vet.  Every animal's needs are different and we want to make sure this one's okay for your furry friend before you try to serve it to him or her."

"Since every animal's needs are different, check with your vet to see if this recipe is good for your pet."

But, those disclaimers have mysteriously disappeared.  There is not one disclaimer accompanying any of her pet recipes. Not one.

I propose that Ray include the disclaimer, "
I am not a veterinarian or pet nutritionist, yet I pretend to know about pet nutrition on tv and on the internet.  My recipes do not intend to diagnose, treat, prevent or cure a disease and unfortunately may kill your dog, but I'm a celebrity so get over it."


About This Blog
Because life ain't worth living without the dog who sniffs the guests and the cat who shreds the toiletpaper. All things fun and educational in the crazy world of pets.