My Billings Gazette

To promote her “Nutrish” line of packaged dog food, Food Network's Rachael Ray published a recipe intended for human consumption in a popular dog lover’s magazine (Modern Dog Magazine, Winter 2008/2009 Edition). The recipe, “Isaboo’s Butternut Squash Mac and Chedder” was inspired, states Ray, by her pit bull Isaboo’s love of squash. But readers were confused and believed the recipe, which included an ingredient that could potentially kill dogs, was intended for dogs.

Nowhere in the magazine article did it state that the recipe was intended for humans, not dogs. And the text accompanying the recipe contained a disclaimer suggesting owners check with their dogs’ veterinarians, again leading many to believe the recipe was for dogs.

Any veterinarian can tell you that onions can cause potentially fatal hemolytic anemia.  The amount ingested makes little difference in terms of size of dog, or ability to metabolize or filter toxins.

Modern Dog Magazine has since added a mild disclaimer (but not before promoting and praising Ray first)  to the website, stating:

"[Rachael Ray's recipe includes onions, which are NOT good for dogs, but the amount included in the recipe is small when considered over the whole of the recipe. Always check with your vet which foods are appropriate to share with your dog. --Ed.] "

The feedback shows readers were still upset, however, and say the magazine should have known better than to publish a recipe containing onions intended for dogs. Some commenters also included links to the ASPCA's Animal Poison Control Center website page concerning onion toxity yet the magazine has taken no further action on the matter.

The recipe is still on Ray’s “Everyday” Magazine website  --under a “Pet Friendly” header, accompanied by a photo of her dog appearing to be eating the concoction-- which, yep, still contains onion.

So what's wrong with the recipes?

Not only is it onions that pet owners need to be concerned about, but a large number of the 36  "pet friendly" recipes Ray has posted, contain ingredients that are potentially toxic, other ingredients are completely inappropriate for pets. 

Let's look at the list of ingredients Ray includes in various recipes intended for pets.  I've also included the dangers that Ray failed to disclose:

Garlic (toxic to pets, particularly cats, causes Heinz body anemia, potentially fatal)
Onion (toxic to pets - causes Heinz body/Hemolytic anemia, potentially fatal - large amounts are used in the recipes)
Salt (detrimental to kidneys and heart in pets, plus high potential for fluid losses and electrolyte imbalances)
Various cheeses (including cheddar, swiss, monterey jack, parmesan, etc - high in fat, causes constipation and/or diarrhea)
Pepper (non-palatable to pets, unnecessary)
Bacon (very high in fat content - in a large majority of the recipes)
Various breads (including wheat - wheat intolerances are common in pets - high in carbohydrates and sugar - large amounts of breads in the recipes, including "buttered" bread)
Avocado (high in fat, some evidence of toxicity in pets)
Spinach (some evidence of spinach leaves toxicity in pets)
Lettuce (no nutritional value - unnecessary)
Lime juice (non-palatable to pets, unncessary)
Orange juice (non-palatable to pets, uncessary)
Hot pepper sauce (she has got to be kidding!)
Chicken and Turkey (high fat content, potential for GI upset and diarrhea)
Soy sauce (high level of salt)
Peanuts (high in protein and fat, no nutritional purpose to give to pets)
Flour and wheat flour (as noted above, wheat intolerances common in pets)
Corn meal (many dogs have allergic reaction to corn products)
Olive oil (fat content - used in nearly every single one of her recipes)
Milk (high in fat, cats in particular are lactose intolerant, causes diarrhea, excess gas in the stomach and intestine, distended abdomen)
Baking spices (used in many of the recipes, no established safety margin in pets, no nutritional purpose for pets)
Deli ham (high levels of fat and salt)
Corned beef (high in fat and salt)
Half and half (high fat content)
Heavy cream (high fat content)
Eggs (used in a large number of the recipes, in large amounts, whole, high protein content)
Peppercorns (use your head, Rachael!)
Barley (some dogs have intolerances)
Macaroni (high in carbohydrates)
Cream Cheese (high in fat)

There are large amounts of ingredients in most of the recipes (as if she were feeding a human family of four), yet small yields, i.e., 4 servings, all loaded with high fat and ingredients inappropriate for pets. As a matter of fact, most of the recipes could cause pancreatitis in dogs, a painful, debilitating, serious condition that requires extensive (and expensive) veterinary treatment.  If a dog survives an episode of acute pancreatitis, it can subsequently lead to chronic pancreatitis (potentially affecting the dog's health for life).

Rachael Ray ignores veterinarians and pet health care advocates who have tirelessly campaigned against pet obesity and continue to diligently educate pet owners on proper diet and nutrition, promote pet exercise, promote early prevention to avoid serious health complications associated with obesity such as: heart disease, diabetes, liver disease, arthritis, and pancreatitis, to name a few.  Rachael Ray seems to be the poster child for irresponsible pet ownership.

Ray and her parent company, Reader's Digest, have also ignored numerous complaints and requests citing the dangers, to have the recipes taken down from the website, to no avail.

Last I checked, in April of this year, Ray had various, inconsistent disclaimers scattered among few recipes and elsewhere on the website:

"Always check with your vet about which foods are appropriate for you to share with your pet."

"Check with your pet's doctor before feeding it any human food.  Pets can't digest the same things we can and your vet is the best person to help you decide if this recipe is right for your pooch."

"Note!  You should not feed your pet human food without first clearing it with your pet's vet.  Every animal's needs are different and we want to make sure this one's okay for your furry friend before you try to serve it to him or her."

"Since every animal's needs are different, check with your vet to see if this recipe is good for your pet."

But, those disclaimers have mysteriously disappeared.  There is not one disclaimer accompanying any of her pet recipes. Not one.

I propose that Ray include the disclaimer, " I am not a veterinarian or pet nutritionist, yet I pretend to know about pet nutrition on tv and on the internet.  My recipes do not intend to diagnose, treat, prevent or cure a disease and unfortunately may kill your dog, but I'm a celebrity so get over it."

Next, if a negative result doesn't reflect any accuracy, why use it?

A positive would MOST CERTAINLY require additional testing, hopefully in the form of a more specific assay test (from an outside lab with knowledge and experience). But say we've already spent a lot of money on your fabulous tests, this is only increasing the cost to the veterinarian, the client, and the pet (in terms of monitoring, or quarantine).  Hopefully, vets and animal shelters have the common sense to avoid your test at all costs.

Perhaps even more alarming and incredulous is the fact that Dyne Immune provides no obvious information to studies, clinical research or clinical trials for the product.  There is of course a link to request more information, I assume should you inquire, you'll be sent to a page with limited and dubious studies, none verified by a peer review of course.  And they state the test can be used for domestic, wild and agriculture animals.  So assume for a moment, you're out there in the field, you don't have a lot of opportunity to re-test that same animal, nor do you have a pristine condition in which to test.  Absurd.